Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Design of course for univerisity teaching management that contribute to improving the teaching learning process in hybrid environments

Abstract

The design of professional development courses from a pedagogical, technological, and methodological perspective in virtual teaching-learning environments constitutes a basic tool for preparing faculty and student assistants who will work as university professors. The objective of this research is to design courses for university teaching management that contribute to improving the teaching-learning process in hybrid environments. This research is the result of the Hybrid Learning Model line of work of the research project entitled "Improving the Training Process: Hybrid Model, Attention to Student Assistants and Talented Students, and Graduate Follow-up." In this regard, theoretical methods such as analysis-synthesis, structural-functional systemic modeling, and modeling were used, as well as empirical methods, including document review and interviews, for the design of courses that guide the implementation of the learning model in hybrid environments. As a result, two courses were designed to prepare trained professors, instructors, and student assistants to work in hybrid environments. Each course consists of four general topics, each with its own set of objectives and content, as well as its own skills and assessment system. Teaching support materials were designed during course implementation. These materials were validated through the application of a PNI technic (Positive, Negative or Interesting).

Keywords

University teaching management, virtual teaching-learning environments, hybrid environments, teaching-learning process


References

  1. Área, M. & Adell, J. (2021). Diseño de cursos en línea para la formación docente universitaria. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 61, 45-70.
  2. García Aretio, L. (2020). Bosque semántico: ¿Educación a Distancia, virtual, en línea, digital, e-lerning? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 23(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.23.1.25495
  3. García Aretio, L., & Ruiz-Corbelia, M. (2017). Modelos de diseño instruccional en la educación superior: Tendencias y aplicaciones. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(2). 39-60. https://doi.org/numero
  4. Graham, C. R. (2019). Blended learning systems: Definition, current treds, and future directions Wiley.
  5. Guaman, R. Villareal, A. Cedeño, E. (2020). La Educación Híbrida como alternativa frente al Covid -19 en el Ecuador. Revista de Investigación Científica TSE´DE, 3(1), 134-147.
  6. Harvard Business School. (2023). Hybrid Learning at HBS. Outcomes and Challenges. https://www.hbs.edu
  7. Means, B., et al. (2023). Meta analysis of hybrid learning outcomes in higher education. Educational Research Review, 39, 100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100512
  8. UNAM. (2023). Informe de implementación del modelo HyFlex 2022-2023. Dirección General de Cómputo y Tecnologías de la Información. https://www.dgti.unam.mx
  9. UNESCO. (2021). Guidelines for ICT in education policies for blended learning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
  10. Universidad de Barcelona (2021). Evaluación del blended learning en grados de educación. https://www.ub.edu/ice

How to Cite

Franco Alvarado, O., Pineda Fernández, C., Rosario Pérez, L., & Vázquez Zubizarrieta, G. (2026). Design of course for univerisity teaching management that contribute to improving the teaching learning process in hybrid environments. Alternativas, 25(2). Retrieved from https://alternativas.ucsg.edu.ec/alternativas/article/view/437

Download Citation

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.